MPCVault Vs Gnosis Safe
Feature comparison
| Feature | Gnosis SAFE | MPCVault |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-address | No, you will need to set up new safes and add co-managers through new on-chain transactions. | Yes, you can have multiple addresses within a single organization and establish different access policies for various wallet groups. No on-chain transaction is required. |
| Multi-chain & support for non-EVM chains | No, you need to explore different solutions on other blockchains, such as Zebec on Solana and m-Safe on Aptos. | MPCVault will support all chains, including non-EVM chains such as Bitcoin, Aptos, Solana, and others. |
| Support eth_sign | eth_sign is not supported, so you can't use zk-based applications such as dYdX. | Yes, you can use any zk-based applications. |
| EVM compatible | • If the sender chooses the wrong network, the transferred assets will be lost. • You cannot use cross-chain bridges such as Arbitrum Bridge. | • You will have the same address across all EVM chains. • You can use any cross-chain bridge. |
| Tedious Transaction Tracking | CFOs may need to manually track transactions using spreadsheets, which is prone to errors and labor-intensive. | Offers a bank-like transaction history with memo fields, streamlining accounting processes. Transactions can be exported as CSV for convenience. |
More info
